Clause 26 - Relations with the Public and the Media

26.1 Prescription only medicines must not be advertised to the public. This prohibition does not apply to vaccination campaigns carried out by companies and approved by the health ministers.

  • Clause 26.1 Advertising of Medicines to the Public

    The advertising of prescription only medicines to the public is also prohibited by the relevant regulations relating to advertising.

    The promotion of medicines to the public for self medication purposes is covered by the Consumer Code of the Proprietary Association of Great Britain (PAGB).

most recent cases See all Applicable Code year
Applicable Code year

Please check the date of the Code that applies to the Case that you are looking at. The date of the complaint may vary from the activity/material alleged to have been in breach.

AUTH/3177/3/19 - Anonymous v Grunenthal Breach: 4.1, 4.3, 4.9, 9.1, 9.9, 14.1, 26.1, 26.2, 28.1 No breach: 7.10, 16.1, 26.3 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 19 March 2019 Completed: 02 October 2019 AUTH/3130/12/18 - Anonymous v GlaxoSmithKline Breach: 9.1, 26.1, 26.2 No breach: 2, 9.1, 12.1, 22.1, 22.4 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 07 December 2018 Completed: 09 August 2019 AUTH/3166/2/19 - Complainant v Sanofi Breach: 9.1, 14.5, 26.1, 26.2 No breach: 2, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.9, 9.9, 11.1, 12.1, 14.1, 16.1, 28.1, 28.6 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 27 February 2019 Completed: 11 June 2019 AUTH/3126/11/18 - Complainant v Alliance Pharmaceuticals Breach: 9.1, 26.1, 26.2 No breach: 2 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 29 November 2018 Completed: 20 March 2019 AUTH/3107/10/18 - Complainant v Daiichi-Sankyo Breach: 9.1, 26.1, 28.1 No breach: 2 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 29 October 2018 Completed: 22 February 2019 AUTH/3108/10/18 - Complainant v Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Europe Breach: 9.1, 26.1, 28.1 No breach: 2 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 29 October 2018 Completed: 20 February 2019 AUTH/3059/8/18 - Anonymous, non-contactable, employee v Lundbeck Company webpage and certification of promotional material Breach: 14.1, 14.4, 26.1, 26.2, 28.3 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 20 August 2018 Completed: 19 December 2018 AUTH/3038/4/18 - Health professional v Novartis Conduct of an employee on LinkedIn Breach: 9.1, 14.1, 26.2, 26.1 No breach: 2, 14.1, 14.3, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 25 April 2018 Completed: 05 December 2018 AUTH/3063/9/18 - Voluntary admission by Dr Falk Pharma Promotion to the public via YouTube Breach: 9.1, 14.1, 26.1, 26.2 No breach: 2, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 06 September 2018 Completed: 12 November 2018 AUTH/3037/4/18 - Health professional v Shield Promotion of Feraccru and unlicensed medicines to the public Breach: 2, 3.1, 4.1, 4.6, 9.1, 14.3, 26.1, 28.1 No breach: 2, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 26 April 2018 Completed: 24 August 2018 AUTH/2831/4/16 - Voluntary admission by Celgene Meetings organised by representatives Breach: 2, 4.1, 4.10, 9.1, 14.1, 15.2, 18.1, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 01 April 2016 Completed: 18 April 2018 AUTH/2988/10/17 - Employee v Otsuka Manager’s use of LinkedIn to promote medicines Breach: 3.1, 3.2, 4.1, 7.2, 9.1, 14.1, 26.1 No breach: 1.2, 2, 9.10, 12.1, 22, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 31 October 2017 Completed: 25 January 2018 AUTH/2961/6/17 - Indivior v Martindale Promotion of Espranor and information to the public Breach: 2, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.9, 9.1, 26.1, 26.2 No breach: 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.6, 9.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 26 June 2017 Completed: 27 June 2017 AUTH/2912/12/16 - Voluntary admission by Astellas Pharma Europe Promotion of Betmiga to the public via social media and the Internet Breach: 9.1, 26.1, 26.2 No breach: 2, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 05 December 2016 Completed: 03 April 2017 AUTH/2924/12/16 - Pharmacist v Lincoln Medical Statements on website Breach: 9.1, 26.1, 28.1 No breach: 2 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 21 December 2016 Completed: 30 January 2017 AUTH/2921/12/16 - Voluntary Admission by Grunenthal Promotion to the public Breach: 9.1, 26.1, 26.2 No breach: 2 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 20 December 2016 Completed: 29 January 2017 AUTH/3184/4/19 - Complainant/Director v GW Pharmaceuticals Breach: 3.1, 4.1, 4.6 No breach: 2, 3.2, 16.1, 26.1, 26.2, 28.1, 29 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 24 April 2019 Completed: 18 November 2019 AUTH/3163/2/19 - Complainant v Alexion Breach: 3.1, 14.1 No breach: 4.1, 4.9, 11.1, 26.1, 26.2, 26.3 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 20 February 2019 Completed: 12 November 2019 AUTH/3173/3/19 - Anonymous v Novo Nordisk Breach: 15.2 No breach: 1.11, 2, 9.1, 9.10, 12.1, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 18 March 2019 Completed: 14 October 2019 AUTH/3167/2/19 - Complainant/Director v Novartis No breach: 2, 4.1, 9.1, 9.10, 12.1, 26.1, 29 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 27 February 2019 Completed: 18 June 2019 AUTH/2883/10/16 - Voluntary admission by Astellas UK Patient support programmes Breach: 2, 7.2, 7.9, 7.11, 9.1, 14.3, 14.5, 21, 24.1 No breach: 2, 9.1, 14.1, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 18 October 2016 Completed: 22 May 2019 AUTH/3142/1/19 - Complainant v Sanofi Online advertisement  No breach: 9.1, 11.1, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 07 January 2019 Completed: 24 April 2019 AUTH/3051/6/18 - Complainant v Alexion Breach: 9.1 No breach: 2, 9.9, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 26 June 2018 Completed: 14 February 2019 AUTH/3010/1/18 - Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer v Daiichi-Sankyo Promotion of Lixiana Breach: 2, 7.10 No breach: 2, 7.9, 9.1, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 12 January 2018 Completed: 17 October 2018 AUTH/3011/1/18 - GlaxoSmithKline v AstraZeneca Press release issued by AstraZeneca Breach: 7.2, 7.3, 7.9, 7.10, 9.1, 26.2 No breach: 2, 7.4, 7.5, 26.1, 26.2, 26.3 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 18 January 2018 Completed: 04 May 2018 AUTH/2982/10/17 - Member of the public v Leo Promotion of Kyntheum to the public No breach: 2, 3.1, 7.2, 7.4, 9.1, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 06 October 2017 Completed: 08 February 2018 AUTH/2983/10/17 - Anonymous, non-contactable v Celgene Promotion of Abraxane to the public Breach: 9.1, 26.2 No breach: 2, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 09 October 2017 Completed: 18 January 2018 AUTH/2981/9/17 - Member of the public v ViiV Use of an iPad in public No breach: 2, 9.1, 15.2, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 26 September 2017 Completed: 23 November 2017 AUTH/2974/9/17 - Anonymous Clinician v ViiV Healthcare Alleged promotion to the public No breach: 2, 4.1, 9.1, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 07 September 2017 Completed: 14 November 2017 AUTH/2950/4/17 - Health professional v Tor Generics Advertisement in The Big Issue Breach: 2, 9.1 No breach: 26.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 01 April 2017 Completed: 09 June 2017 AUTH/2934/2/17 - Health professional consultant to a pharmaceutical company v Johnson & Johnson Promotion of Nicorette Breach: 4.4 No breach: 4.1, 4.3, 9.1, 11.1, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 08 February 2017 Completed: 10 May 2017 AUTH/2890/11/16 - Health professional v Novo Nordisk Company website Breach: 9.10, 14.5, 26.2 No breach: 4.1, 4.6, 9.1, 14.5, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 18 November 2016 Completed: 04 April 2017 AUTH/2918/12/16 - Ex-employee v GlaxoSmithKline Material on internal hosting server No breach: 4.1, 4.3, 4.9, 4.10, 9.1, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 19 December 2016 Completed: 03 February 2017 AUTH/2880/10/16 - Anonymous, Non Contactable v Bristol-Myers Squibb Alleged pre-licence of Opdivo No breach: 3.2, 9.1, 18.1, 22.1, 26.1, 26.2, 2 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 11 October 2016 Completed: 19 January 2017 AUTH/2878/10/16 - Member of the public v Meda Alleged promotion to the public No breach: 2, 9.1, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 28 October 2016 Completed: 16 November 2016 AUTH/2860/7/16 - Health Professional v Chiesi Alleged promotion to the public No breach: 2, 9.1, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 25 July 2016 Completed: 08 September 2016 AUTH/2859/7/16 - Health Professional v AstraZeneca Alleged promotion to the public No breach: 2, 9.1, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 25 July 2016 Completed: 08 September 2016 AUTH/2861/7/16 - Anonymous v Bristol-Myers Squibb Promotion of Daklinza No breach: 2, 9.1, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 29 July 2016 Completed: 02 September 2016 AUTH/2851/6/16 - Anonymous, contactable v Novo Nordisk Alleged promotion of Tresiba to the public No breach: 2, 9.1, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 15 June 2016 Completed: 18 August 2016 AUTH/2837/4/16 - Anonymous employee v Leo In-house communications material and reporting line of a medical science liaison team No breach: 2, 9.1, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 12 April 2016 Completed: 03 June 2016 AUTH/2819/2/16 - General Practitioner v Otsuka Jinarc patient materials No breach: 2, 9.1, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 23 March 2016 Completed: 23 March 2016

26.2 Information about prescription only medicines which is made available to the public either directly or indirectly must be factual and presented in a balanced way. It must not raise unfounded hopes of successful treatment or be misleading with respect to the safety of the product.

Statements must not be made for the purpose of encouraging members of the public to ask their health professional to prescribe a specific prescription only medicine.

  • Clause 26.2 Information to the Public

    This clause allows for the provision of non-promotional information about prescription only medicines to the public either in response to a direct enquiry from an individual, including enquiries from journalists, or by dissemination of such information via press conferences, press announcements, television and radio reports, public relations activities and the like. It also includes information provided by means of posters distributed for display in surgery waiting rooms etc and reference information made available by companies on their websites or otherwise as a resource for members of the public.

    Any information so provided must observe the principles set out in this clause; that is, it should be factual, balanced and must not be made for the purpose of encouraging members of the public to ask their doctors or other prescribers to prescribe a specific prescription only medicine. It must not constitute the advertising of prescription only medicines to the public prohibited under Clause 26.1. The provisions of Clause 26.4 must be observed if an enquiry is from an individual member of the public.

    Information to the public falls into one of three categories depending on its purpose, how it is supplied and how the public is made aware of the information. Companies should take particular care if they use social media.

    Proactive information is supplied to the public without a direct request. This includes booklets on diseases and/or medicines supplied directly or via a health professional, press releases, briefings, conferences, mailings to patient organisations and disease awareness advertising.

    Reference information is intended to provide a comprehensive up-to-date resource that companies should make available on their websites or by way of a link from their website or by some other means. The primary purpose of reference information is to be a library resource for members of the public giving information relating to prescription only medicines which have marketing authorizations. Pharmaceutical companies are not obliged to provide reference information but it is considered good practice to provide as a minimum the regulatory information comprising the summary of product characteristics (SPC), the package leaflet (PIL) and the public assessment report (PAR) (UK or European) where such a document exists. Reference information may also include the registration studies used for marketing authorization applications and variations and any other studies published or not including those referred to in the SPC, PIL, EPAR or UKPAR or available on clinical trial databases. Reference information may also include material supplied for health technology assessments to bodies such as the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), the All Wales Medicines Strategy Group (AWMSG) and the Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC).

    Reference information may also include medicine guides where available, studies (published or not), information about diseases and information about specific medicines etc.

    Where companies decide to make reference information available this must represent fairly the current body of evidence relating to a medicine and its benefit/risk profile.

    Reactive information is supplied to the public in response to a direct request and must be limited to that information necessary to respond to the request.

    It is good practice to include the summary of product characteristics with a press release or press pack relating to a medicine. Companies should also consider including references to other credible sources of information about a condition or a medicine.

    Particular care must be taken in responding to approaches from the media to ensure that the provisions of this clause are upheld.

    In the event of a complaint which relates to the provisions of this clause, companies will be asked to provide copies of any information supplied, including copies of any relevant press releases and the like. This information will be assessed to determine whether it fulfils the requirements of this clause.

    Public assessment reports (European or UK), summaries of product characteristics and package leaflets may be provided to members of the public on request.

    Companies may provide members of the health professions with material concerning a medicine with a view to its provision to patients to whom the medicine has already been prescribed. Such material must be factual and non-promotional and clearly state the intended audience.

    A company may conduct a disease awareness or public health campaign provided that the purpose is to encourage members of the public to seek treatment for their symptoms while in no way promoting the use of a specific medicine. The use of brand or non-proprietary names and/or restricting the range of treatments described in the campaign might be likely to lead to the use of a specific medicine. Particular care must be taken where the company’s product, even though not named, is the only medicine relevant to the disease or symptoms in question.

    Attention is drawn to the Disease Awareness Campaigns Guidelines produced by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency.

    The requirements of Clause 7 relating to information (Clauses 7.2, 7.4, 7.5, 7.8, 7.9, 7.10 and 7.11) also apply to information to the public.

    Meetings organised for or attended by members of the public, journalists and patient organisations must comply with Clause 22.

    Items for patients or for use by patients are covered in Clause 18.2. and its supplementary information.

  • Clause 26.2 Financial Information

    Information made available in order to inform shareholders, the Stock Exchange and the like by way of annual reports and announcements etc may relate to both existing medicines and those not yet marketed. Such information must be factual and presented in a balanced way. Business press releases should identify the business importance of the information.

  • Clause 26.2 Information to Current or Prospective Employees

    Information about pharmaceutical companies provided to current or prospective employees may relate to both existing medicines and those not yet marketed. Such information must be factual and presented in a balanced way.

  • Clause 26.2 Approval of Information

    Information on medicines made available under this clause other than responses from medical information departments or similar to unsolicited enquiries from the public must be certified in advance as required by Clause 14.3.

  • Clause 26.2 Health Technology Assessments

    Companies may supply information to relevant patient organisations, the public or patients in relation to forthcoming health technology assessments by public national organisations such as NICE, AWMSG or SMC, provided the information is accurate, not misleading, not promotional in nature and otherwise complies with Clause 26.2.

most recent cases See all Applicable Code year
Applicable Code year

Please check the date of the Code that applies to the Case that you are looking at. The date of the complaint may vary from the activity/material alleged to have been in breach.

AUTH/3177/3/19 - Anonymous v Grunenthal Breach: 4.1, 4.3, 4.9, 9.1, 9.9, 14.1, 26.1, 26.2, 28.1 No breach: 7.10, 16.1, 26.3 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 19 March 2019 Completed: 02 October 2019 AUTH/3130/12/18 - Anonymous v GlaxoSmithKline Breach: 9.1, 26.1, 26.2 No breach: 2, 9.1, 12.1, 22.1, 22.4 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 07 December 2018 Completed: 09 August 2019 AUTH/3166/2/19 - Complainant v Sanofi Breach: 9.1, 14.5, 26.1, 26.2 No breach: 2, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.9, 9.9, 11.1, 12.1, 14.1, 16.1, 28.1, 28.6 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 27 February 2019 Completed: 11 June 2019 AUTH/3126/11/18 - Complainant v Alliance Pharmaceuticals Breach: 9.1, 26.1, 26.2 No breach: 2 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 29 November 2018 Completed: 20 March 2019 AUTH/3059/8/18 - Anonymous, non-contactable, employee v Lundbeck Company webpage and certification of promotional material Breach: 14.1, 14.4, 26.1, 26.2, 28.3 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 20 August 2018 Completed: 19 December 2018 AUTH/3038/4/18 - Health professional v Novartis Conduct of an employee on LinkedIn Breach: 9.1, 14.1, 26.2, 26.1 No breach: 2, 14.1, 14.3, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 25 April 2018 Completed: 05 December 2018 AUTH/3063/9/18 - Voluntary admission by Dr Falk Pharma Promotion to the public via YouTube Breach: 9.1, 14.1, 26.1, 26.2 No breach: 2, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 06 September 2018 Completed: 12 November 2018 AUTH/3011/1/18 - GlaxoSmithKline v AstraZeneca Press release issued by AstraZeneca Breach: 7.2, 7.3, 7.9, 7.10, 9.1, 26.2 No breach: 2, 7.4, 7.5, 26.1, 26.2, 26.3 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 18 January 2018 Completed: 04 May 2018 AUTH/2983/10/17 - Anonymous, non-contactable v Celgene Promotion of Abraxane to the public Breach: 9.1, 26.2 No breach: 2, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 09 October 2017 Completed: 18 January 2018 AUTH/2972/8/17 - Anonymous healthcare journalist v UCB UCB website Breach: 2, 7.2, 9.1, 14.5, 26.2 No breach: 14.3, 26.3 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 18 August 2017 Completed: 19 December 2017 AUTH/2961/6/17 - Indivior v Martindale Promotion of Espranor and information to the public Breach: 2, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.9, 9.1, 26.1, 26.2 No breach: 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.6, 9.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 26 June 2017 Completed: 27 June 2017 AUTH/2890/11/16 - Health professional v Novo Nordisk Company website Breach: 9.10, 14.5, 26.2 No breach: 4.1, 4.6, 9.1, 14.5, 26.1 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 18 November 2016 Completed: 04 April 2017 AUTH/2912/12/16 - Voluntary admission by Astellas Pharma Europe Promotion of Betmiga to the public via social media and the Internet Breach: 9.1, 26.1, 26.2 No breach: 2, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 05 December 2016 Completed: 03 April 2017 AUTH/2921/12/16 - Voluntary Admission by Grunenthal Promotion to the public Breach: 9.1, 26.1, 26.2 No breach: 2 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 20 December 2016 Completed: 29 January 2017 AUTH/3184/4/19 - Complainant/Director v GW Pharmaceuticals Breach: 3.1, 4.1, 4.6 No breach: 2, 3.2, 16.1, 26.1, 26.2, 28.1, 29 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 24 April 2019 Completed: 18 November 2019 AUTH/3163/2/19 - Complainant v Alexion Breach: 3.1, 14.1 No breach: 4.1, 4.9, 11.1, 26.1, 26.2, 26.3 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 20 February 2019 Completed: 12 November 2019 AUTH/3142/1/19 - Complainant v Sanofi Online advertisement  No breach: 9.1, 11.1, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2019 Received: 07 January 2019 Completed: 24 April 2019 AUTH/3051/6/18 - Complainant v Alexion Breach: 9.1 No breach: 2, 9.9, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 26 June 2018 Completed: 14 February 2019 AUTH/3010/1/18 - Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer v Daiichi-Sankyo Promotion of Lixiana Breach: 2, 7.10 No breach: 2, 7.9, 9.1, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 12 January 2018 Completed: 17 October 2018 AUTH/2927/1/17 - Anonymous, non contactable v Roche Article on BBC website No breach: 2, 9.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 04 January 2017 Completed: 07 February 2017 AUTH/2880/10/16 - Anonymous, Non Contactable v Bristol-Myers Squibb Alleged pre-licence of Opdivo No breach: 3.2, 9.1, 18.1, 22.1, 26.1, 26.2, 2 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 11 October 2016 Completed: 19 January 2017 AUTH/2819/2/16 - General Practitioner v Otsuka Jinarc patient materials No breach: 2, 9.1, 26.1, 26.2 Applicable Code: 2016 Received: 23 March 2016 Completed: 23 March 2016

26.3 Any material which relates to a medicine and which is intended for patients taking that medicine must include the statement below or a similar one:

‘Reporting of side effects

If you get any side effects, talk to your doctor, pharmacist or nurse. This includes any possible side effects not listed in the package leaflet. You can also report side effects directly via the Yellow Card Scheme at www.mhra.gov.uk/yellowcard.

By reporting side effects you can help provide more information on the safety of this medicine.’

When the material relates to a medicine which is subject to additional monitoring an inverted black equilateral triangle must be included on it together with the statement below or a similar one:

‘This medicine is subject to additional monitoring. This will allow quick identification of new safety information. You can help by reporting any side effects you may get. See www.mhra.gov.uk/yellowcard for how to report side effects.’

  • Clause 26.3 Obligatory Wording

    The obligatory wording required corresponds to that required for package leaflets by the European Quality Review of Documents Group which updated the requirements in The Human Medicines Regulations 2012. If the suggested wording is not used the same meaning must be conveyed.

    In the event that the website address given in Clause 26.3 is changed by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, companies may use a statement incorporating the new address as soon as the change is made and must use the new address within one year of the change.

  • Clause 26.3 Black Triangle Symbol

    Details of the black triangle symbol can be found in the supplementary information to Clause 4.10

most recent cases See all Applicable Code year
Applicable Code year

Please check the date of the Code that applies to the Case that you are looking at. The date of the complaint may vary from the activity/material alleged to have been in breach.

26.4 Requests from individual members of the public for advice on personal medical matters must be refused and the enquirer recommended to consult his or her own doctor or other prescriber or other health professional.

  • Clause 26.4 Requests for Information or Advice on Personal Medical Matters

    This clause prohibits the provision of advice on personal medical matters to individual members of the public requesting it. The intention behind this prohibition is to ensure that companies do not intervene in the patient/doctor or patient/prescriber relationship by offering advice or information which properly should be in the domain of the doctor or other prescriber.

    Pharmaceutical companies can provide information appropriate to support the use of medicines and enhance patient welfare. Emergency advice, for example action needed in the event of an overdose, can be provided. Other information may also be given, including information on medicines prescribed for the enquirer, provided that it complies with the requirements of Clauses 26.1 and 26.2 and does not impinge on the principle behind this clause. For example, answering requests from members of the public as to whether a particular medicine contains sucrose or some other inactive ingredient, or whether there would be problems associated with drinking alcohol whilst taking the medicine or whether the medicine should be taken before or after a meal, is acceptable. Particular care needs to be taken with regard to enquiries relating to adverse reactions, the indications for a medicine and suchlike.

    All requests from members of the public must be handled with great care and a company should refer the enquirer to other sources where appropriate. These might include health professionals, NHS Choices, NHS 111, their equivanlents in the devolved nations and patient organisations, etc.

    A request from a patient for information may in some instances best be handled by passing the information to the patient’s doctor or other prescriber for discussion with them rather than providing the information direct to the patient concerned. This should not be done without the patient’s consent.

26.5 Companies are responsible for information about their products which is issued by their public relations agencies.