Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
Sign In
Restrict your results by using the refiners below:
Search

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Narrow Your Results:​

 

 

AUTH/2481/2/12 - A muslim affairs specialist v ProStrakan319506/06/2014 14:17:04The Panel noted ProStrakan’s submission that no promotional material for Adcal-D3 Caplets to the Halal status of Adcal-D3 Caplets had only been doing as instructed by ProStrakan STS_ListItem_PublishingPageshttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Pages/Forms/AllItems.aspx0http://www.pmcpa.org.uk06/06/2014 14:17:04htmlFalseaspx1616~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_WebPage.js
AUTH/1862/7/06 - ProStrakan/Director v Shire268406/06/2014 14:14:35Appeal:Appeals by respondent and complainant Review given and no breach of the Code was ruled which was upheld on appeal by ProStrakan STS_ListItem_PublishingPageshttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Pages/Forms/AllItems.aspx0http://www.pmcpa.org.uk06/06/2014 14:14:35htmlFalseaspx1616~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_WebPage.js
2012 August Review78611/09/2012 09:21:34NUMBER 77 August 2012 CODE OF PRACTICE REVIEW The Prescription Medicines Code of Practice some complaints involve more than one respondent company and some complaints do not become STS_ListItem_DocumentLibraryhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F2012%20August%20Review%2Epdf&action=interactivepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F2012%20August%20Review%2Epdf&action=imagepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Code of Practice Reviews/Forms/AllItems.aspx0http://www.pmcpa.org.uk11/09/2012 09:21:34pdfFalsepdf1515~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_PDF.js
2009 February Review77426/02/2009 09:33:41NUMBER 63 FEBRUARY 2009 CODE OF PRACTICE REVIEW The Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority was established by The Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry STS_ListItem_DocumentLibraryhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F2009%20February%20Review%2Epdf&action=interactivepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F2009%20February%20Review%2Epdf&action=imagepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Code of Practice Reviews/Forms/AllItems.aspx0http://www.pmcpa.org.uk26/02/2009 09:33:41pdfFalsepdf1515~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_PDF.js
2007 February Review75808/03/2012 16:07:24PRESCRIPTION MEDICINES CODE OF PRACTICE AUTHORITY The Prescription Medicines Code of Both complainants and respondents may appeal to the Code of Practice Appeal Board against STS_ListItem_DocumentLibraryhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F2007%20February%20Review%2Epdf&action=interactivepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F2007%20February%20Review%2Epdf&action=imagepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Code of Practice Reviews/Forms/AllItems.aspx0http://www.pmcpa.org.uk08/03/2012 16:07:24pdfFalsepdf1515~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_PDF.js
2013 February Review79114/03/2013 15:17:20NUMBER 79 February 2013 CODE OF PRACTICE REVIEW The Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority was established by The Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry STS_ListItem_DocumentLibraryhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F2013%20February%20Review%2Epdf&action=interactivepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F2013%20February%20Review%2Epdf&action=imagepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Code of Practice Reviews/Forms/AllItems.aspx0http://www.pmcpa.org.uk14/03/2013 15:17:20pdfFalsepdf1515~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_PDF.js
2006 August Review220408/03/2012 15:54:20Both complainants and respondents may appeal to the Code of Practice Appeal Board against some complaints involve more than one respondent company and some complaints do not become STS_ListItem_DocumentLibraryhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F1999%20to%20May%202006%2F2006%20August%20%20Review%2Epdf&action=interactivepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F1999%20to%20May%202006%2F2006%20August%20%20Review%2Epdf&action=imagepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Code of Practice Reviews/1999 to May 20060http://www.pmcpa.org.uk08/03/2012 15:54:20pdfFalsepdf1515~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_PDF.js
2012 November Review 78916/11/2012 12:44:52NUMBER 78 November 2012 CODE OF PRACTICE REVIEW The Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority was established by The Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry STS_ListItem_DocumentLibraryhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F2012%20November%20Review%2Epdf&action=interactivepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F2012%20November%20Review%2Epdf&action=imagepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Code of Practice Reviews/Forms/AllItems.aspx0http://www.pmcpa.org.uk16/11/2012 12:44:52pdfFalsepdf1515~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_PDF.js
2010 August Review77813/08/2010 15:12:46NUMBER 69 AUGUST 2010 CODE OF PRACTICE REVIEW The Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority was established by The Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI STS_ListItem_DocumentLibraryhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F2010%20August%20%20Review%2Epdf&action=interactivepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F2010%20August%20%20Review%2Epdf&action=imagepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Code of Practice Reviews/Forms/AllItems.aspx0http://www.pmcpa.org.uk13/08/2010 15:12:46pdfFalsepdf1515~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_PDF.js
2009 May Review77627/05/2009 11:17:49some complaints involve more than one respondent company and some complaints do not become in inter-company complaints for the respondent company to claim that the requirements of STS_ListItem_DocumentLibraryhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F2009%20May%20Review%2Epdf&action=interactivepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F2009%20May%20Review%2Epdf&action=imagepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Code of Practice Reviews/Forms/AllItems.aspx0http://www.pmcpa.org.uk27/05/2009 11:17:49pdfFalsepdf1515~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_PDF.js

Restrict your results by using the refiners below:
Related links