Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
Sign In
Restrict your results by using the refiners below:
Search

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Narrow Your Results:​

 

 

AUTH/1848/6/06 - Media/Director v Janssen-Cilag267006/06/2014 14:14:33Case ref:Media/Director v Janssen-Cilag Description:Alleged payment to journalist Appeal:Appeal by respondent Review:Published in the November STS_ListItem_PublishingPageshttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Pages/Forms/AllItems.aspx0http://www.pmcpa.org.uk06/06/2014 14:14:33htmlFalseaspx1616~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_WebPage.js
AUTH/2868/8/16 - Janssen v Sanofi Genzyme 352310/03/2017 15:00:32Appeal:Appeal by respondent Status:Appeal by respondent Review:Published in the February Click here to suggest your own STS_ListItem_PublishingPageshttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Pages/Forms/AllItems.aspx0http://www.pmcpa.org.uk10/03/2017 15:00:32htmlFalseaspx1616~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_WebPage.js
AUTH/3106/10/18 - Voluntary admission by Janssen 5100905/08/2019 14:29:54The Panel noted that Janssen was also told on 26 September 2018 that the publisher decided independently of Janssen and the media buyer to run the same STS_ListItem_PublishingPageshttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Pages/Forms/AllItems.aspx0http://www.pmcpa.org.uk05/08/2019 14:29:54htmlFalseaspx1616~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_WebPage.js
AUTH/2059/10/07 - PCT Medical Manager v Janssen-Cilag283306/06/2014 14:15:29Status:The respondent can appeal Review:Published in the Cases involving PCT Medical Manager Cases involving Janssen-Cilag Advanced searchSTS_ListItem_PublishingPageshttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Pages/Forms/AllItems.aspx0http://www.pmcpa.org.uk06/06/2014 14:15:29htmlFalseaspx1616~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_WebPage.js
AUTH/2611/6/13 - Anonymous Nurse v Janssen 329806/06/2014 14:17:33Case ref:Anonymous Nurse v Janssen Description:Promotional Aid Appeal:Respondent appeal Status:No breach STS_ListItem_PublishingPageshttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Pages/Forms/AllItems.aspx0http://www.pmcpa.org.uk06/06/2014 14:17:33htmlFalseaspx1616~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_WebPage.js
AUTH/2978/9/17 - Anonymous consultant dermatologist v Janssen 361717/07/2018 14:11:48Appeal:Appeal by respondent Status:Appeal by respondent Review:Published in the May Click here to suggest your own STS_ListItem_PublishingPageshttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Pages/Forms/AllItems.aspx0http://www.pmcpa.org.uk17/07/2018 14:11:48htmlFalseaspx1616~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_WebPage.js
AUTH/2801/11/15 - Voluntary admission by Janssen346231/03/2016 09:42:08Further details from Janssen are given below The Panel noted Janssen’s submission that the publishing group had, without Janssen’s prior knowledge, inserted the Stelara bound STS_ListItem_PublishingPageshttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Pages/Forms/AllItems.aspx0http://www.pmcpa.org.uk31/03/2016 09:42:08htmlFalseaspx1616~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_WebPage.js
AUTH/2825/3/16 and AUTH/2826/3/16 - Janssen-Cilag v Boehringer Ingelheim and Lilly 348511/12/2017 09:42:43Jardiance Appeal:Appeal by respondents Status:Report to the Appeal Board, respondent appeal Review:Published in STS_ListItem_PublishingPageshttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Pages/Forms/AllItems.aspx0http://www.pmcpa.org.uk11/12/2017 09:42:43htmlFalseaspx1616~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_WebPage.js
AUTH/1842/6/06 - Senior Community Mental Health Nurse/MHRA v Janssen-Cilag5204416/03/2012 09:06:34According to Janssen-Cilag’s records the complainant had not met any Janssen-Cilag representatives It appeared that in 2005 a Janssen-Cilag STS_ListItem_DocumentLibraryhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FDocuments%2F2006%2F1842%20November%2Epdf&action=interactivepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FDocuments%2F2006%2F1842%20November%2Epdf&action=imagepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Documents/20060http://www.pmcpa.org.uk16/03/2012 09:06:34pdfFalsepdf1515~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_PDF.js
2836Nov 2016209007/12/2016 15:16:04AstraZeneca stated that Janssen acknowledged during inter-company dialogue that no The Panel noted Janssen’s submission that some of SPC data were from studies in which STS_ListItem_DocumentLibraryhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FDocuments%2F2016%2F2836Nov%202016%2Epdf&action=interactivepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FDocuments%2F2016%2F2836Nov%202016%2Epdf&action=imagepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Documents/20160http://www.pmcpa.org.uk07/12/2016 15:16:04pdfFalsepdf1515~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_PDF.js

Restrict your results by using the refiners below:
Related links