Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
Sign In
Restrict your results by using the refiners below:
Search

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Narrow Your Results:​

 

 

AUTH/2825/3/16 and AUTH/2826/3/16 - Janssen-Cilag v Boehringer Ingelheim and Lilly 348511/12/2017 09:42:43Case ref:Janssen-Cilag v Boehringer Ingelheim and Lilly Description:Promotion of Jardiance Appeal:Appeal by respondents Status STS_ListItem_PublishingPageshttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Pages/Forms/AllItems.aspx0http://www.pmcpa.org.uk11/12/2017 09:42:43htmlFalseaspx1616~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_WebPage.js
2864 Feb 2017211209/03/2017 14:29:43THE CODE ANONYMOUS, NON CONTACTABLE v BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM Engagement of a consultant and his The Panel noted that Boehringer Ingelheim’s first interaction with the named health STS_ListItem_DocumentLibraryhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FDocuments%2F2016%2F2864%20Feb%202017%2Epdf&action=interactivepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FDocuments%2F2016%2F2864%20Feb%202017%2Epdf&action=imagepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Documents/20160http://www.pmcpa.org.uk09/03/2017 14:29:43pdfFalsepdf1515~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_PDF.js
2000 May review218205/03/2012 15:26:28Public reprimand for Schwarz Pharma Schwarz Pharma has been publicly reprimanded by the Both complainants and respondents may appeal to the Code of Practice Appeal Board against STS_ListItem_DocumentLibraryhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F1999%20to%20May%202006%2F2000%20May%20review%2Epdf&action=interactivepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F1999%20to%20May%202006%2F2000%20May%20review%2Epdf&action=imagepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Code of Practice Reviews/1999 to May 20060http://www.pmcpa.org.uk05/03/2012 15:26:28pdfFalsepdf1515~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_PDF.js
2012 February Review78712/03/2012 16:44:22NUMBER 75 February 2012 CODE OF PRACTICE REVIEW The Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority was established by The Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry STS_ListItem_DocumentLibraryhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F2012%20February%20Review%2Epdf&action=interactivepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F2012%20February%20Review%2Epdf&action=imagepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Code of Practice Reviews/Forms/AllItems.aspx0http://www.pmcpa.org.uk12/03/2012 16:44:22pdfFalsepdf1515~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_PDF.js
2012 May Review78806/07/2012 09:52:01NUMBER 76 May 2012 CODE OF PRACTICE REVIEW The Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority was established by The Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI STS_ListItem_DocumentLibraryhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F2012%20May%20Review%2Epdf&action=interactivepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F2012%20May%20Review%2Epdf&action=imagepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Code of Practice Reviews/Forms/AllItems.aspx0http://www.pmcpa.org.uk06/07/2012 09:52:01pdfFalsepdf1515~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_PDF.js
2016 November Review80507/12/2016 14:51:01NUMBER 94 November 2016 CODE OF PRACTICE REVIEW The Prescription Medicines Code of Practice that the reports did not name the respondent company or the medicines involved where no STS_ListItem_DocumentLibraryhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F2016%20November%20Review%2Epdf&action=interactivepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F2016%20November%20Review%2Epdf&action=imagepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Code of Practice Reviews/Forms/AllItems.aspx0http://www.pmcpa.org.uk07/12/2016 14:51:01pdfFalsepdf1515~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_PDF.js
2017 November Review81205/12/2017 14:07:43It was the respondent company’s responsibility to provide accurate information some complaints involved more than one respondent company, and some complaints do not STS_ListItem_DocumentLibraryhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2FNovember%202017%20Review%2Epdf&action=interactivepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2FNovember%202017%20Review%2Epdf&action=imagepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Code of Practice Reviews/Forms/AllItems.aspx0http://www.pmcpa.org.uk05/12/2017 14:07:43pdfFalsepdf1515~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_PDF.js
2011 November Review78516/12/2011 15:05:29greatly helped in this regard if respondent companies ensured that all the necessary and As a respondent, you should try to put yourself in the Panel’s position and consider what STS_ListItem_DocumentLibraryhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F2011%20November%20%20Review%2Epdf&action=interactivepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F2011%20November%20%20Review%2Epdf&action=imagepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Code of Practice Reviews/Forms/AllItems.aspx0http://www.pmcpa.org.uk16/12/2011 15:05:29pdfFalsepdf1515~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_PDF.js
February 2017 Review5104613/03/2017 15:24:37NUMBER 95 February 2017 CODE OF PRACTICE REVIEW The Prescription Medicines Code of Practice When she started at the PMCPA respondent companies were notified of a complaint by STS_ListItem_DocumentLibraryhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F2017%20February%20Review%20%2D%2Epdf&action=interactivepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F2017%20February%20Review%20%2D%2Epdf&action=imagepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Code of Practice Reviews/Forms/AllItems.aspx0http://www.pmcpa.org.uk13/03/2017 15:24:37pdfFalsepdf1515~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_PDF.js
2012 November Review 78916/11/2012 12:44:52NUMBER 78 November 2012 CODE OF PRACTICE REVIEW The Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority was established by The Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry STS_ListItem_DocumentLibraryhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F2012%20November%20Review%2Epdf&action=interactivepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F2012%20November%20Review%2Epdf&action=imagepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Code of Practice Reviews/Forms/AllItems.aspx0http://www.pmcpa.org.uk16/11/2012 12:44:52pdfFalsepdf1515~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_PDF.js

Restrict your results by using the refiners below:
Related links