Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
Sign In
Restrict your results by using the refiners below:
Search

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Narrow Your Results:​

 

 

AUTH/2037/8/07 - Pharmaceutical adviser at a PCT v Teva199216/03/2012 09:08:04The complainant noted that the discontinuation of Becotide (BDP inhaler) by The complainant was concerned that at the meeting Teva’s medical director had emphasised the following: a STS_ListItem_DocumentLibraryhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FDocuments%2F2007%2F2037%20Feb%202008%2Epdf&action=interactivepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FDocuments%2F2007%2F2037%20Feb%202008%2Epdf&action=imagepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Documents/20070http://www.pmcpa.org.uk16/03/2012 09:08:04pdfFalsepdf1515~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_PDF.js
AUTH/1931/12/06 - Practice Manager v Teva155716/03/2012 09:06:35RESPONSE Teva explained that the representative in question had called to see the complainant to introduce herself and discuss the changes STS_ListItem_DocumentLibraryhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FDocuments%2F2006%2F1931%20May%2Epdf&action=interactivepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FDocuments%2F2006%2F1931%20May%2Epdf&action=imagepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Documents/20060http://www.pmcpa.org.uk16/03/2012 09:06:35pdfFalsepdf1515~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_PDF.js
AUTH/1931/12/06 - Practice Manager v Teva273706/06/2014 14:15:03When asked to comment on Teva’s response, the complainant stated that the representative had implied Cases involving Practice Manager Cases involving Teva Advanced searchSTS_ListItem_PublishingPageshttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Pages/Forms/AllItems.aspx0http://www.pmcpa.org.uk06/06/2014 14:15:03htmlFalseaspx1616~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_WebPage.js
AUTH/2037/8/07 - Pharmaceutical adviser at a PCT v Teva281606/06/2014 14:15:12Pharmaceutical adviser at a PCT v Teva Description:Promotion of Qvar Appeal:No appeal Status:Both the complainant and the respondent can STS_ListItem_PublishingPageshttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Pages/Forms/AllItems.aspx0http://www.pmcpa.org.uk06/06/2014 14:15:12htmlFalseaspx1616~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_WebPage.js
AUTH/2986/10/17 - Anonymous, non-contactable v Teva 362410/04/2018 14:19:03An anonymous, non-contactable complainant alleged that between July 2017 and October 2017, a named individual, employed by Teva as an account manager contacted/visited a named STS_ListItem_PublishingPageshttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Pages/Forms/AllItems.aspx0http://www.pmcpa.org.uk10/04/2018 14:19:03htmlFalseaspx1616~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_WebPage.js
AUTH/2523/7/12 - Anonymous v Teva 323006/06/2014 14:17:26Teva had submitted that the venue in question was in no way renown for its entertainment this case the Panel considered that the complainant had not established on the balance of STS_ListItem_PublishingPageshttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Pages/Forms/AllItems.aspx0http://www.pmcpa.org.uk06/06/2014 14:17:26htmlFalseaspx1616~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_WebPage.js
AUTH/2081/1/08 - PCT Pharmacist v Teva126716/03/2012 09:08:05The complainant noted that an ‘unrestricted’ educational grant from Teva was referred to on the front cover Teva had no part in creating the article after agreeing the initial brief STS_ListItem_DocumentLibraryhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FDocuments%2F2008%2F2081%20May%202008%2Epdf&action=interactivepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FDocuments%2F2008%2F2081%20May%202008%2Epdf&action=imagepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Documents/20080http://www.pmcpa.org.uk16/03/2012 09:08:05pdfFalsepdf1515~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_PDF.js
AUTH/2081/1/08 - PCT Pharmacist v Teva284906/06/2014 14:15:31The complainant noted that an ‘unrestricted’ educational grant from Teva was referred to on the front cover Teva’s agency and the commissioned author produced the article STS_ListItem_PublishingPageshttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Pages/Forms/AllItems.aspx0http://www.pmcpa.org.uk06/06/2014 14:15:31htmlFalseaspx1616~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_WebPage.js
AUTH/2060/10/07 - GP v Teva283406/06/2014 14:15:29The complainant noted that emphasis was placed ona large long-term study (Fireman et al The Panel noted Teva’s submission about the classification of studies as open-label or STS_ListItem_PublishingPageshttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Pages/Forms/AllItems.aspx0http://www.pmcpa.org.uk06/06/2014 14:15:29htmlFalseaspx1616~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_WebPage.js
AUTH/2060/10/07 - GP v Teva201016/03/2012 09:08:04A guide to changing to CFC-free The complainant noted that emphasis was placed on CASE AUTH/2060/10/07 GENERAL PRACTITIONER v TEVA Guidelines in Practice insert 61542 Review No STS_ListItem_DocumentLibraryhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FDocuments%2F2007%2F2060%20May%202008%2Epdf&action=interactivepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FDocuments%2F2007%2F2060%20May%202008%2Epdf&action=imagepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Documents/20070http://www.pmcpa.org.uk16/03/2012 09:08:04pdfFalsepdf1515~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_PDF.js

Restrict your results by using the refiners below:
Related links