Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
Sign In
Restrict your results by using the refiners below:
Search

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Narrow Your Results:​

 

 

AUTH/1842/6/06 - Senior Community Mental Health Nurse/MHRA v Janssen-Cilag266406/06/2014 14:14:33This appeared to be at odds with the complainant’s experience According to Janssen-Cilag’s records the complainant had not met any Janssen-Cilag representatives STS_ListItem_PublishingPageshttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Pages/Forms/AllItems.aspx0http://www.pmcpa.org.uk06/06/2014 14:14:33htmlFalseaspx1616~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_WebPage.js
AUTH/1842/6/06 - Senior Community Mental Health Nurse/MHRA v Janssen-Cilag5204416/03/2012 09:06:34According to Janssen-Cilag’s records the complainant had not met any Janssen-Cilag representatives It appeared that in 2005 a Janssen-Cilag STS_ListItem_DocumentLibraryhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FDocuments%2F2006%2F1842%20November%2Epdf&action=interactivepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FDocuments%2F2006%2F1842%20November%2Epdf&action=imagepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Documents/20060http://www.pmcpa.org.uk16/03/2012 09:06:34pdfFalsepdf1515~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_PDF.js
AUTH/1942/1/07 - Member of the Public v Janssen-Cilag192316/03/2012 09:07:43The complainant alleged that the claim that medicines would reduce the risk of further illness was also untrue, since Janssen-Cilag had stated the importance of not STS_ListItem_DocumentLibraryhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FDocuments%2F2007%2F1942%20May%2Epdf&action=interactivepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FDocuments%2F2007%2F1942%20May%2Epdf&action=imagepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Documents/20070http://www.pmcpa.org.uk16/03/2012 09:07:43pdfFalsepdf1515~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_PDF.js
AUTH/1831/4/06 - General Practitioner v Janssen-Cilag5203616/03/2012 09:06:33Janssen-Cilag denied a breach of Clause 9.9 of the Code was also sought to reveal the complainant’s identity to Janssen-Cilag thus allowing it to search its STS_ListItem_DocumentLibraryhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FDocuments%2F2006%2F1831%20November%2Epdf&action=interactivepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FDocuments%2F2006%2F1831%20November%2Epdf&action=imagepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Documents/20060http://www.pmcpa.org.uk16/03/2012 09:06:33pdfFalsepdf1515~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_PDF.js
AUTH/1942/1/07 - Member of the Public v Janssen-Cilag274706/06/2014 14:15:04The complainant alleged that the claim that medicines would reduce the risk of further illness was also untrue, since Janssen-Cilag had stated the importance of not STS_ListItem_PublishingPageshttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Pages/Forms/AllItems.aspx0http://www.pmcpa.org.uk06/06/2014 14:15:04htmlFalseaspx1616~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_WebPage.js
AUTH/1897/10/06 - Anonymous v Janssen-Cilag271106/06/2014 14:14:38The complainant drew particular attention to a meeting held in Dubai, December 2006, sponsored by Janssen-Cilag and organised by the South Asian Forum No breach of the Code was STS_ListItem_PublishingPageshttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Pages/Forms/AllItems.aspx0http://www.pmcpa.org.uk06/06/2014 14:14:38htmlFalseaspx1616~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_WebPage.js
AUTH/1868/7/06 - Doctor v Janssen-Cilag5208916/03/2012 09:06:34was therefore accepted as suitable, by both the complainant and Janssen-Cilag Janssen-Cilag noted the complainant’s view that the most effective dose of co-codamol and STS_ListItem_DocumentLibraryhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FDocuments%2F2006%2F1868%20November%2Epdf&action=interactivepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FDocuments%2F2006%2F1868%20November%2Epdf&action=imagepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Documents/20060http://www.pmcpa.org.uk16/03/2012 09:06:34pdfFalsepdf1515~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_PDF.js
AUTH/2253/7/09 - Consultant psychiatrist v Janssen-Cilag299306/06/2014 14:16:04The complainant stated that a Janssen-Cilag representative recently showed a presentation The Panel noted that Janssen-Cilag had provided part of the presentation; a sub-section STS_ListItem_PublishingPageshttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Pages/Forms/AllItems.aspx0http://www.pmcpa.org.uk06/06/2014 14:16:04htmlFalseaspx1616~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_WebPage.js
AUTH/1994/4/07 - Anonymous v Janssen-Cilag195916/03/2012 09:07:44Janssen-Cilag had not sponsored any delegates to attend companies, one of which was Janssen-Cilag Ltd. COMPLAINT The complainant stated that a few psychiatrists under the STS_ListItem_DocumentLibraryhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FDocuments%2F2007%2F1994%20Aug%202007%2Epdf&action=interactivepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FDocuments%2F2007%2F1994%20Aug%202007%2Epdf&action=imagepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Documents/20070http://www.pmcpa.org.uk16/03/2012 09:07:44pdfFalsepdf1515~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_PDF.js
AUTH/1994/4/07 - Anonymous v Janssen-Cilag278306/06/2014 14:15:08to have been provided by three pharmaceutical companies, one of which was Janssen-Cilag for the 2007 meeting submitted by Janssen-Cilag and that provided by the complainant STS_ListItem_PublishingPageshttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Pages/Forms/AllItems.aspx0http://www.pmcpa.org.uk06/06/2014 14:15:08htmlFalseaspx1616~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_WebPage.js

Restrict your results by using the refiners below:
Related links