Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
Sign In
Restrict your results by using the refiners below:
Search

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Narrow Your Results:​

 

 

AUTH/2978/9/17 - Anonymous consultant dermatologist v Janssen 361717/07/2018 14:11:48number:AUTH/2978/9/17 Case ref:Anonymous consultant dermatologist v Janssen Description:Alleged Promotion of STS_ListItem_PublishingPageshttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Pages/Forms/AllItems.aspx0http://www.pmcpa.org.uk17/07/2018 14:11:48htmlFalseaspx1616~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_WebPage.js
2014 May Review79605/06/2014 10:42:53NUMBER 84 May 2014 CODE OF PRACTICE REVIEW The There were 13 other anonymous complaints in addition to the ten from anonymous health professionals One was from an anonymous employee STS_ListItem_DocumentLibraryhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F2014%20May%20Review%2Epdf&action=interactivepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F2014%20May%20Review%2Epdf&action=imagepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Code of Practice Reviews/Forms/AllItems.aspx0http://www.pmcpa.org.uk05/06/2014 10:42:53pdfFalsepdf1515~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_PDF.js
AUTH/2102/2/08 - Anonymous company representative v Meda128516/03/2012 09:08:05The complainant had not been entirely clear as to what his complaint was about the letter Review August 2008 CASE AUTH/2102/3/08 ANONYMOUS REPRESENTATIVE v MEDA Promotion of Aldara STS_ListItem_DocumentLibraryhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FDocuments%2F2008%2F2102%20Aug%202008%2Epdf&action=interactivepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FDocuments%2F2008%2F2102%20Aug%202008%2Epdf&action=imagepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Documents/20080http://www.pmcpa.org.uk16/03/2012 09:08:05pdfFalsepdf1515~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_PDF.js
2007 February Review75808/03/2012 16:07:24Both complainants and respondents may appeal to the Code of Practice Appeal Board against There were thirteen other anonymous complaints and four complaints were made by STS_ListItem_DocumentLibraryhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F2007%20February%20Review%2Epdf&action=interactivepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F2007%20February%20Review%2Epdf&action=imagepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Code of Practice Reviews/Forms/AllItems.aspx0http://www.pmcpa.org.uk08/03/2012 16:07:24pdfFalsepdf1515~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_PDF.js
2004 Feb Review219707/03/2012 11:09:04Both complainants and respondents may appeal to the Code of Practice Appeal Board against medicines, two were from former pharmaceutical company employees and three were anonymous STS_ListItem_DocumentLibraryhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F1999%20to%20May%202006%2F2004%20Feb%20Review%2Epdf&action=interactivepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F1999%20to%20May%202006%2F2004%20Feb%20Review%2Epdf&action=imagepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Code of Practice Reviews/1999 to May 20060http://www.pmcpa.org.uk07/03/2012 11:09:04pdfFalsepdf1515~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_PDF.js
2008 November Review77010/12/2008 11:56:19NUMBER 62 NOVEMBER 2008 CODE OF PRACTICE REVIEW The Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority was established by The Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry STS_ListItem_DocumentLibraryhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F2008%20November%20Review%2Epdf&action=interactivepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F2008%20November%20Review%2Epdf&action=imagepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Code of Practice Reviews/Forms/AllItems.aspx0http://www.pmcpa.org.uk10/12/2008 11:56:19pdfFalsepdf1515~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_PDF.js
2978 May 2018206404/07/2018 10:24:052018 75 CASE AUTH/2978/9/17 ANONYMOUS NON-CONTACTABLE CONSULTANT DERMATOLOGIST v JANSSEN Promotion of Tremfya An anonymous, non-contactable consultant dermatologist STS_ListItem_DocumentLibraryhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FDocuments%2F2017%2F2978%20May%202018%2Epdf&action=interactivepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FDocuments%2F2017%2F2978%20May%202018%2Epdf&action=imagepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Documents/20170http://www.pmcpa.org.uk04/07/2018 10:24:05pdfFalsepdf1515~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_PDF.js
2009 May Review77627/05/2009 11:17:49Thus complainant companies must be consistent in their citation of clauses of the Code That is not the purpose for which dermatologists require packs of emollients and thus they STS_ListItem_DocumentLibraryhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F2009%20May%20Review%2Epdf&action=interactivepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F2009%20May%20Review%2Epdf&action=imagepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Code of Practice Reviews/Forms/AllItems.aspx0http://www.pmcpa.org.uk27/05/2009 11:17:49pdfFalsepdf1515~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_PDF.js
2018 May Review80917/07/2018 10:02:27media engagement undertaken by their consultants or advisors particularly where such engagement relates to the project for which the consultant/advisor is employed STS_ListItem_DocumentLibraryhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F2018%20May%20Review%2Epdf&action=interactivepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F2018%20May%20Review%2Epdf&action=imagepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Code of Practice Reviews/Forms/AllItems.aspx0http://www.pmcpa.org.uk17/07/2018 10:02:27pdfFalsepdf1515~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_PDF.js
2005 February Review220108/03/2012 14:48:58PRESCRIPTION MEDICINES CODE OF PRACTICE AUTHORITY The Prescription Both complainants and respondents may appeal to the Code of Practice Appeal Board against Two were anonymous STS_ListItem_DocumentLibraryhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F1999%20to%20May%202006%2F2005%20February%20Review%2Epdf&action=interactivepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=%2Fcases%2FCode%20of%20Practice%20Reviews%2F1999%20to%20May%202006%2F2005%20February%20Review%2Epdf&action=imagepreviewhttp://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/Code of Practice Reviews/1999 to May 20060http://www.pmcpa.org.uk08/03/2012 14:48:58pdfFalsepdf1515~sitecollection/_catalogs/masterpage/Display Templates/Search/Item_PDF.js

Restrict your results by using the refiners below:
Related links